To understand the title of that post you must:
2) Go the the following week’s "Letters to the Editor" section of said newspaper for one of the lowest in asshattery in response to Rachel’s comment; and note the really touching (in a "touching a live electical wire" sort of way) analogy "James D" uses to defend "intimacy"; and,
3) Read Rachel’s bemused, and not-so-slightly pissed off response to said asshat in her Lusty Lady blog today.
Underneath even the lustiest ladies lie a total bitch, waiting to be sprung. Memo to Loser James D: You’ve been served, fool.